Simply put, freedom is
the absence of government coercion. Our Founding Fathers
understood this, and created the least coercive government
in the history of the world. The Constitution established a
very limited, decentralized government to provide national
defense and little else. States, not the federal government,
were charged with protecting individuals against criminal
force and fraud. For the first time, a government was
created solely to protect the rights, liberties, and
property of its citizens. Any government coercion beyond
that necessary to secure those rights was forbidden, both
through the Bill of Rights and the doctrine of strictly
enumerated powers. This reflected the founders’ belief that
democratic government could be as tyrannical as any King.
Few Americans understand
that all government action is inherently coercive. If
nothing else, government action requires taxes. If taxes
were freely paid, they wouldn’t be called taxes, they’d be
called donations. If we intend to use the word freedom in an
honest way, we should have the simple integrity to give it
real meaning: Freedom is living without government coercion.
So when a politician talks about freedom for this group or
that, ask yourself whether he is advocating more government
action or less.
The political left
equates freedom with liberation from material wants, always
via a large and benevolent government that exists to create
equality on earth. To modern liberals, men are free only
when the laws of economics and scarcity are suspended, the
landlord is rebuffed, the doctor presents no bill, and
groceries are given away. But philosopher Ayn Rand (and many
others before her) demolished this argument by explaining
how such “freedom” for some is possible only when government
takes freedoms away from others. In other words, government
claims on the lives and property of those who are expected
to provide housing, medical care, food, etc., for others are
coercive – and thus incompatible with freedom. “Liberalism,”
which once stood for civil, political, and economic
liberties, has become a synonym for omnipotent coercive
government.
The political right
equates freedom with national greatness brought about
through military strength. Like the left, modern
conservatives favor an all-powerful central state – but for
militarism, corporatism, and faith-based welfarism. Unlike
the Taft-Goldwater conservatives of yesteryear, today’s
Republicans are eager to expand government spending,
increase the federal police apparatus, and intervene
militarily around the world. The last tenuous links between
conservatives and support for smaller government have been
severed. “Conservatism,” which once meant respect for
tradition and distrust of active government, has transformed
into big-government utopian grandiosity.
Orwell certainly was
right about the use of meaningless words in politics. If we
hope to remain free, we must cut through the fog and attach
concrete meanings to the words politicians use to deceive
us. We must reassert that America is a republic, not a
democracy, and remind ourselves that the Constitution places
limits on government that no majority can overrule. We must
resist any use of the word “freedom” to describe state
action. We must reject the current meaningless designations
of “liberals” and “conservatives,” in favor of an accurate
term for both: statists.
Every politician on earth
claims to support freedom. The problem is so few of them
understand the simple meaning of the word.
|