During the 1970's, Canada's Department of Regional Industrial
Development introduced an economic stimulus package aimed at easing regional
economic disparities. The federal government provided grant funds to companies
that opened up in regions of high unemployment. Initially that program actually
appeared to work over the short term. Government consultants at the time had
high praise for the program that stimulated local economies and created jobs.
The reports all focused on short-term results and on the perceived benefits to
various communities as new companies opened up to provide employment.
Local businesses expanded in response to the perceived opportunities
that new manufacturing industries could offer a community. For a while,
government figures who handed out the money become local heroes. However, as the
federal funds for the new industries began to expire, the federally subsidized
companies closed their doors in one location and moved to other locations, and
many people lost their jobs.
Established businesses that had expanded their operations had to
scale back and lay-off even more employees. Other long-established businesses
that had taken out new business loans to expand their operations literally
closed their doors. While the regional economic program lasted, some communities
literally became revolving doors for federally subsidized industries. Local
citizens soon became disheartened, as they knew that the jobs were only for the
short term. The new federally subsidized industry would leave town once the
federal funding expired. Having learned hard lessons, other long-established
local businesses responded in a cool manner to the subsidized newcomers.
During the early 1990's, Canada and the USA initiated an extensive
economic stimulus package for the then-emerging high-tech sector. The stimulus
package included grants and low-interest loans being made available to both
established and start-up information sector companies. The easy terms of the
government program achieved the short-term objective of stimulating spectacular
growth in the high-tech and information sectors. Soon the recipients of
government funding engaged in business transactions with numerous other
companies.
These companies tested market demand for their products and services
by fluctuating prices and received very positive market feedback. But the
high-tech boom became the high-tech mal-investment boom as companies formulated
plans based on this grossly misleading market feedback. Only massive government
involvement in the Canadian and American high-tech and information sectors could
have distorted the market to produce such feedback. The dot-com bust and
high-tech meltdown were the result of the cozy partnership between government
and industry.
|