Former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker warned that the leaked
documents might have a "chilling effect," and make Iraqi
political figures more hesitant to cooperate with the United
States. Because you know the last thing we want, in that
nifty new Iraqi "democracy" that sits like a shining city on
a hill amidst the corrupt authoritarianism of the Near East,
is for the Iraqi people to know what their government is
doing. I mean, what kind of functioning democracy can you
have if the sovereign people are able to learn what their
public servants are up to and maybe even interfere?
Wikileaks is a classic example of what John Robb—a
specialist on networked, asymmetric warfare—calls "individual
superempowerment." Individual superempowerment is "the
ability of one individual to do what it took a large company
or government agency to do a couple of decades ago" ("Julian
Assange," Global Guerrillas, August 15). As a
result, "individuals and small groups [can] take on much
larger foes." ("Open
Warfare and Replication," Global Guerrillas,
September 20).
"In short," Robb continues, "the weak are enabled to defeat
the strong."
It used to be that only another large organization had the
resources necessary to take on a large, hierarchical
organization. John Kenneth Galbraith called it "countervailing
power": The power of big business was constrained by big
government, big labor, and big media.
The beauty of the desktop revolution is that it has
radically deflated the capital outlays required for
production in the information and cultural realms. In
publishing, music, software, and much of journalism,
individuals and small groups with at most a few thousand
dollars in desktop computers, accessories and software can
produce output of a quality that once required a
million-dollar music studio or printing press.
And you can add "countervailing power" to the list of
functions that the desktop revolution has put within the
reach of the superempowered individual.
|