Welfare, Education, and the Appeal of Gangs in American
Cities |
When JFK was elected as America’s president, black American youth had a
comparatively low crime rate and low unemployment rate, while single
black women had a lower birth rate than their white counterparts. Within
a decade following the introduction of President Johnson’s War on
Poverty and expansion of social welfare, crime among black American
youth had increased dramatically, as had the birthrate among single
black women.
During his inaugural speech, US President Obama commented that a large
percentage of African American fathers were AWOL from their family
responsibilities. When JFK began his term in office, black American
youth had very low rates of gang membership. Today, African American
youth face an unemployment rate of some 40%, and gang membership has
increased dramatically. An estimated two thirds of African American boys
live in fatherless homes and, thanks to the gradual departure of men
from the teaching profession, attend schools without any mature adult
male role models as teachers. Older male gang members now function as
role models for new gang members.
Over a century ago, slave owners in Jamaica removed fathers and older
males from traditional African family groups as a means of reducing
slave uprisings and rebellions. Today, up to 75% of Jamaican boys may be
born into mother-only families, the long-term result of slave owners
having earlier broken traditional family bonds. A very large percentage
of fatherless Jamaican youth have some form of gang connection, a
tradition that has even spread into Canada’s largest city, Toronto,
where Caribbean gangs conduct business in the lucrative drug trade.
Gangs represent a surrogate family for a large percentage of fatherless
youths. As workers are laid off during an economic downturn, gang
membership may increase. Organized gangs are usually able to earn income
by trading in the underground economy, by selling restricted and
forbidden merchandise. Prohibition raises the price of such merchandise.
As a family business, the gang’s business side provides income for
members while the family side provides for the emotional needs of their
members.
|
“Gangs represent a surrogate
family for a large percentage of fatherless youths. As
workers are laid off during an economic downturn, gang
membership may increase.” |
Gang leaders ensure that individual members participate in group
activities where each member gets to look good in front of peers who
provide encouragement, recognition, validation, emotional support, and
approval, as well as a sense of acceptance and status to their fellow
members. Such activities usually inflict harm on targeted outsiders who
may be subject to swarming, gang rape or physical assault. While
individual members might actually despise participating in gang rape,
they do so in the presence of fellow gang members to gain the
acceptance, recognition, approval and validation of their peers.
Some gangs engage in a game in which they attack unsuspecting senior
citizens. Youth gangs in Chicago have boarded city buses to beat up
unsuspecting passengers. Teenagers in some large cities in the UK have
been recorded initiating unprovoked physical assaults on other
unsuspecting teenagers who were riding aboard city buses. Their peers
recorded the event and later posted it on social media web pages. These
disturbing trends represent the result of well-meaning and often badly
misguided governmental social policies that have resulted in the
breakdown of traditional family bonds, and government school policies
that favor women teachers and so have removed adult male role models
from the lives of young boys.
In Western nations, labor laws that set minimum wage levels discourage
youth employment, with the result that an elevated percentage of modern
youths engage in anti-social behaviour. Before such laws existed, youths
could easily find casual employment close to home, working for an
agreed-upon rate and being paid cash for performing any of a variety of
useful and constructive tasks. Their participation in such employment
provided youths of an earlier era with a combination of income,
self-worth, self-respect, and personal dignity.
An older generation of supervisors and employers often provided some
form of acknowledgement and recognition for successful completion of a
job, along with some tacit approval for doing something constructive and
for being good people. Earlier communities provided opportunities for
willing youths to contribute constructively to the well-being of the
community, then receive acknowledgement and compensation for their
efforts. Through the process of economic regulation and especially
labour laws, modern state policy has greatly reduced the number of such
opportunities for youths.
Western governments seek to address the problems of misbehaved youths
while ignoring state policy as a possible causal factor of such
problems. Various jurisdictions have introduced the failed
zero-tolerance policy for misbehaviour at school. Government officials
seek to address the bullying problem by enacting anti-bullying
legislation, that is, a national version of the failed zero-tolerance
policy. To address cyberbullying, governments seek to introduce
cyberbullying legislation that includes a series of penalties for
offenders. But increases in bullying and cyberbullying may well be a
symptom of dysfunctional government social and educational policy.
|
|
From the same author |
▪
State Economic Control and the Electric Power Feed-in
Tariff
(no
316 – November 15, 2013)
▪
The Alleged Downstream Benefits of Government
Investment In Industry
(no
316 – November 15, 2013)
▪
Social Responsibility and Clothing Manufacturing
(no
315 – October 15, 2013)
▪
Black Economic Empowerment: Private vs. State
Initiatives
(no
315 – October 15, 2013)
▪
The Challenge of the Immigrant Worker
(no
314 – Sept. 15, 2013)
▪
More...
|
|
First written appearance of the
word 'liberty,' circa 2300 B.C. |
Le Québécois Libre
Promoting individual liberty, free markets and voluntary
cooperation since 1998.
|
|