Centrally Planning the Job Market: We Need More Data! |
We the People of the federal parliamentary democracy of Canada, in Order
to form a more perfect picture of our country’s Job Market, establish
full Employment, insure domestic Training, provide for the common pool
of Labour, promote the general working stiff, and secure the Blessings
of Productivity to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this promise to further Tax the general populace in order to fund the
collection of More Data.
For it is not sufficient to know our nation’s monthly job vacancy
numbers broken down by province and territory; we also need to know
which specific regions within those provinces and territories are in
need of labour, as well as which specific skills are in short supply. So
speaketh the Auditor General of Canada, Michael Ferguson, in his spring
report to the august body of Parliament, and so agreeeth the director of
Statscan’s labour statistics division, Alison Hale,
in an interview with
The Globe and Mail.
This data is of the utmost importance so that we the people might better
plan the utilization of our brawn and brains, and put these qualities to
work producing goods and services for our fellow citizens. Of course,
individually, we cannot be counted upon to act in our own best
interests, nor to spontaneously coordinate our actions to the benefit of
others in society, for we are, as individuals, sorely lacking in basic
common sense. It is to save us from ourselves, and more specifically
from our ignorance and folly, that governments are instituted among us.
And thankfully, the world is so designed that only the very best of the
species, who are not beset with such flaws and peccadillos as afflict
the mere mortals among us, are attracted to and manage to grab hold of
the reins of power in order to use it for the betterment of the rest of
us. Furthermore, far from being a corrupting influence, as some would
have it, power polishes the virtue of those who wield it, until they
verily shine with goodness and competence.
Our honourable representatives in government, however noble and true and
pure of heart they be, have need of data in order to serve us better. In
order to design plans that will centrally coordinate the supply and
demand for temporary foreign workers and employment insurance—central
plans, we might call them—the government needs a finer grain of
information. How else will it decide which kinds of people, from which
foreign countries, with which particular skill sets, it will allow
private companies to hire? How else will it organize the minute details
of the workings of the employment insurance program?
|
“Thankfully, the world is so
designed that only the very best of the species, who are not
beset with such flaws and peccadillos as afflict the mere
mortals among us, are attracted to and manage to grab hold
of the reins of power in order to use it for the betterment
of the rest of us.” |
According to The Globe and Mail, Nathan Cullen, finance critic
for the Official Opposition, accused the government of relying on
nothing but anecdotes to rationalize its policy decisions. “They’re
definitely not relying on data, because it doesn’t exist,” he said,
adding, “Certainly collecting more data about something so important as
the labour market would be important, because the government spends
billions on programs, essentially blind.”
Indeed, the kind of survey needed to give the gift of sight to
government planners in this particular matter of job vacancies by region
and by specific skill would cost well in excess of $5 million, said Ms.
Hale. Meanwhile, Statscan’s core budget, which does not include spending
on the census or contracted surveys, has been cut by more than 7%, or
$29.3 million, over the past two years. Its remaining core budget of
some three or four hundred million dollars is all tied up in other,
equally important work providing data for other, equally important
central plans.
Some ideologues oppose the government’s involvement in the job market,
arguing that no amount of data collection would ever suffice for the
top-down organization of such complex and dynamic interactions. They
claim that central plans cannot be but blunt instruments, bruising and
smashing individual hopes and dreams, and distorting the incentives and
price signals that would otherwise allow individual workers and
employers to make the best use of their resources given the constraints
of reality. They believe that without allowing free play to the forces
of the market, the data that central planners need never even emerges
and therefore cannot be collected. Some go so far as to call for the
dismantling of the programs on which the government spends those
billions, given the impossibility of resolving its inherent blindness.
We must reject out of hand the siren call of such troublemakers,
preferably without examining their reasoning too closely. If we, as a
society, do not empower our elected representatives and unelected
bureaucrats to collect the data they need, even if that data is mangled
and destroyed in the process, then companies will be doomed to pay for
and conduct their own employee searches and decide for themselves
whether looking beyond the country’s borders is worth the effort. Job
seekers, too, will be left to their own devices, and have to figure out
where to look for work based solely on massive advertising campaigns,
free job search websites, employment services, word of mouth, and
intimate knowledge of the details of their own lives, preferences, and
personal quirks.
One shudders to think of the chaos into which this great country of ours
would surely be plunged were it not for the guidance of our wise and
beneficent leaders. Let us hold fast and give them the tools they need
to collect ever more data!
|
|
From the same author |
▪
Individual Control of Individual Education
(no
321 – April 15, 2014)
▪
The Politics of Envy and Jealousy
(no
320 – March 15, 2014)
▪
The Limits of Power: A Review of Malcolm Gladwell's
David and Goliath
(no
319 – February 15, 2014)
▪
Math Education Should Be Set Free
(no
318 – January 15, 2014)
▪
Santa on Trial
(no
317 – December 15, 2013)
▪
More...
|
|
First written appearance of the
word 'liberty,' circa 2300 B.C. |
Le Québécois Libre
Promoting individual liberty, free markets and voluntary
cooperation since 1998.
|
|