Freedom Encourages Goodwill to All |
"Christopher Hitchens on libertarians: 'I have always
found it quaint and rather touching that there is a movement
in the U.S. that thinks Americans are not yet selfish
enough.'"
A friend posted the above statement on Facebook a few weeks ago, along
with a photo of the late Christopher Hitchens, and added the following
comment of his own: “He was often a complete idiot (being a contrarian
was his fatal, childish flaw), but in this case, he’s right on target.”
I couldn’t help myself; I responded, no doubt unhelpfully, that although
Hitchens was always an entertaining writer, he was as childishly wrong
about this as he could possibly be.
In the spirit of the season, let me take a few moments here to try to be
a bit more helpful. First of all, to clarify, far from thinking that
Americans are not yet selfish enough, libertarians think that human
beings are not yet free enough, whether they live in Bangor,
Maine or Bangladesh. Whether you use the greater liberty libertarians
want you to have to help your fellow man or to go off and live in the
woods by yourself is strictly speaking immaterial. Freedom makes you
free; what you do with that freedom is up to you, and has nothing really
to do with libertarianism.
To be fair to Hitchens, though, there are some libertarians who
explicitly endorse a form of selfishness, and these are probably the
people to whom he was referring. They are fans and followers of
Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Provocatively enough, Rand
wrote a book entitled The Virtue of Selfishness, so part of the
blame falls on her shoulders for preferring provocation over clarity.
Because the selfishness to which this title alludes is more properly
called rational or enlightened self-interest.
|
“Freedom makes you
free; what you do with that freedom is up to you, and has nothing really
to do with libertarianism.” |
As anyone who has actually read Rand’s work will confirm, the
selfishness that she advocated amounts to saying: Your life belongs to
you. It does not belong to your parents, or your neighbour, or your
honourable representatives in government. It is yours to live as you see
fit. But as a direct and explicit corollary, neither does your
neighbour’s life belong to you. Neither a slave nor a master be.
The alternative to dealing with other human beings through the use of
force, as masters and slaves, is to deal with each other voluntarily, as
traders, offering value for value. If your self-interested end is to
become rich, the only way to do so while respecting the code of honour
promulgated by Ayn Rand is to offer other people something they want and
are willing to pay you for. What a rotten, selfish bitch, eh?
In fact, liberating people to enrich themselves through trade and
innovation, and assigning dignity
to this pursuit of material plenty,
is precisely what has made large swaths of the world so fabulously
wealthy by historical standards. Criticizing the “selfishness” of
honest, hard-working, creative people who just want to improve their
lot—as did a feature on the rise of China in
this weekend’s Globe and
Mail—therefore risks undoing the great material progress of modern
civilization.
The notion that forcing people to be less self-interested would promote
anything but resentment is really difficult for me to wrap my head
around, Hitch’s wisecracks notwithstanding. If we want to promote a
feeling of goodwill to all, we need to let people be free to enrich
themselves by providing value to others. Only to the extent that we come
to see each other primarily as sources of value rather than as threats
to our security, as traders rather than as masters and slaves, will we
approach that other Christmas ideal: peace on Earth.
|
|
From the same author |
▪
Just Cause, or Just 'Cause?
(no
325 – October 15, 2014)
▪
The Great Fact: A Review of Deirdre McCloskey's
Bourgeois Dignity
(no
324 – Sept. 15, 2014)
▪
The Police State Needed to Enforce Vice Laws
(no
323 – June 15, 2014)
▪
Centrally Planning the Job Market: We Need More Data!
(no
322 – May 15, 2014)
▪
Individual Control of Individual Education
(no
321 – April 15, 2014)
▪
More...
|
|
First written appearance of the
word 'liberty,' circa 2300 B.C. |
Le Québécois Libre
Promoting individual liberty, free markets and voluntary
cooperation since 1998.
|
|