|
Montréal, 25 novembre 2000 / No 72 |
|
|
by
Paul Geddes
Most people would label me a straight-laced, conservative, boring book-reader. And yet in this federal election, not only am I supporting the Marijuana Party, I am actually a candidate for it here in BC. Many friends and family members are astonished. After all, I am a college economics instructor, married for over twenty years, with two children in a private Christian elementary school. And my idea of a celebration consists of (at most) an occasional beer. So why the Marijuana Party? |
A
war against responsibility
Because I think drug prohibition is just, plain wrong. Since, none of the other parties seem to want to do anything about it, I've got to put my life where my mouth is. Isn't it time that Canadians listened to advice from Milton Friedman, George Soros, The Economist and others of similar calibre? The war against drugs is really a war against personal choice and responsibility. If you value your remaining liberties, get out of your armchairs, get down to the polling station and cast a ballot for the Marijuana Party. Let's review some of the arguments: 1) Prohibition isn't stopping drug usage. Despite gobs of taxes wasted on enforcement, drugs are easily available.At public meetings in my riding, I find that I have to keep making the same points over and over again. First, the freedom to be allowed to use drugs does not mean that you have to use them. There are many legal activities in Canada that I would strongly urge you to stay away from: the music (?) of Madonna, David Suzuki sermons or cabbage. All are harmful to thinking minds, but I would never advocate making any such distasteful activities illegal. To each their own. In the same manner, even when drugs are legal, there will still be many helpful saints who will support addicts trying to refrain from drug usage. The difference being, if drugs were legal, these helpers would have to respect the addicts' rights to make their own decisions about life.
Second, if we take away from people the right to make a wrong choice, we give them no credit for making the good choices in life. If drug taking is about morality, why do so many Canadians think that the flawed characters who sit in Ottawa should be allowed to make our moral choices for us? And how can we learn responsibility if the government, like an overbearing parent, is constantly watching over us to make sure we don t make any unapproved choices? Third, I keep having to respond to the claim that marijuana is dangerous. Well, so what? Many things in life have risks. Anyone who has lived in BC for the last 10 years, has much stronger scientific evidence that voting for the NDP is much more dangerous for your health than marijuana could ever be. Should we lock up all the irresponsible NDP supporters? No. As with other risky behaviour, we must keep appealing to people's better senses and hope that they will eventually learn from their past mistakes. In this election, I want to strike a blow for individual freedom, self-responsibility and for the virtues of private property and entrepreneurship. Do you want to support one of the mainstream parties who differ with each other only in how they want to control your life? Send a real message to Ottawa that you are tired of politics as usual, and in one part of your life at least, you just want the traditional politicians to go away. To paraphrase a recently deceased prime minister: The state should have no role to play in our choice of peaceful social lubricants and psychological crutches. Choose freedom! Vote Marijuana! |
<< retour au sommaire |
|